|
The So-Called Energy
Bill
December 30, 2007
The President recently signed into a law an energy
bill passed by Congress at the eleventh hour, just in
time to allow the Members who voted for it to go home
for the holidays and tell their constituents that Congress
is successfully moving this Nation towards energy independence
and energy security.
I will not be delivering that message to my fellow
Alaskans, because quite frankly, doing so would be disingenuous.
The so-called energy bill being touted as a "step toward
energy security and energy independence" will do little
if anything to accomplish those goals, and it will hurt
- not help - this nation and the millions of American
families suffering from increased energy costs. In fact,
under the mandates outlined in this bill, Americans
will now face the very real prospect of paying more
to heat their homes, fuel their vehicles, and put food
on the table.
By focusing on a host of efficiency and renewable energy
mandates, while doing nothing to expand production of
the domestically-abundant conventional energy sources
that account for 95 percent of our Nation's energy needs,
this "energy bill" is akin to an Iraq War funding bill
that excludes money for guns, tanks, and ammunition.
Renewable energy, and conservation and efficiency measures
are important and we must pursue them aggressively.
However, they are but one piece of a comprehensive energy
policy aimed at reducing energy costs, enhancing energy
security, and reducing our dependence on hostile foreign
nations. An energy bill that focuses solely on efficiency
and renewable energy mandates, and completely ignores
the need expand domestic production of coal, oil, natural
gas, nuclear and hydropower - the backbone of our Nation's
economy - is NOT an energy bill.
God blessed this Nation with a bounty of resources,
and with advanced technology and American ingenuity
we can produce our vast domestic reserves of conventional
energy while keeping greenhouse gas emissions to a minimum.
Taken together with increased renewable energy production
and enhanced energy efficiency and conservation, we
can truly begin to move this Nation toward energy independence.
Unfortunately, the energy bill just signed into law
will leave this country increasingly dependent on hostile
foreign nations, and Americans will suffer the consequences.
There are those who think this "Energy Bill" is sound,
comprehensive energy policy, and may believe that my
opposition to the bill is "out-of-step" with the needs
of Alaska. They must have missed yesterday's KTUU poll
which found that more than 80 percent of Alaskans agree
that the Energy Bill "does not do enough to create a
secure energy future for Americans."
Yes, it would have been easy to vote yes on this bill,
and apparently it's even easier for my opponents to
criticize me for voting no. But Alaskans expect me to
vote as an Alaskan and consider the real needs of our
Alaskan people, communities, and the state. As your
Representative in Congress, I could not in good conscience
support a bill that will have very real economic consequences
on Alaskans and the Nation as a whole.
|